The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Civil Revision No.7499 of 2017 as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner during the hearing, after consultations between the bench and counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7499 of 2017 Date of decision: 11.01.2018
Subhash Kalia
.......Petitioner
versus
Abnash Chander and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel prays that she may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ramendra Jain) Judge
January 11, 2018 R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No.
Ravinder Singh 2018.01.12 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Subhash Kalia
Abnash Chander
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
