Dismissed
Surinder Kumar v. Harmanprit Singh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/3270/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2018.03.13 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CR No.3270 of 2013 (O&M)
Surinder Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
Harmanprit Singh and Ors.
....Respondents
Date of Order: 08.3.2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.M Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Satyaveer Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 9.
AMIT RAWAL, J (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in writ petition bearing CWP No.18924 of 2009 rendered by this Court, the petitioners were relegated to take remedy in accordance with law either by filing suit or application for partition of the property and therefore the order dated 27.2.2013 (P.7) impugned herein would be inoperative thereby rendering the present petition infructuous.
Said order produced by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record, a copy of which has been given to counsel opposite.
In view of aforesaid, present petition is rendered incapable of any further relief being granted.
| March 08, 2018 | `(AMIT RAWAL) | |
|---|---|---|
| manoj | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable |
: Yes/No |
Surinder Kumar
Harmanprit Singh
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court