The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of revision petition CR-2671-2015 as infructuous as no cause of action survived.
Revision petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR-2671-2015 (O&M)
1
201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2671-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.05.2018
Gargi Sandhu
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Punjab and Sind Bank and others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Adarsh Pal Kaur, Advocate for the respondents.
AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in the matter, therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
( AMIT RAWAL) 29.05.2018 JUDGE
Yogesh Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No
Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Yogesh Sharma 2018.05.30 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gargi Sandhu
Punjab and Sind Bank
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
