The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a regular second appeal as the parties had compromised the matter.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Regul ar Second Appeal No. 2179 of 2016 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 28. 05. 2018
Raj want Kaur and ot her s
…. . Appel l ant s
ver sus
Anoop Si ngh and ot her s
CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE AMI T RAWAL
Pr esent : Mr . B. P. S. Vi r k, Advocat e f or t he appel l ant s
AMI T RAWAL, J. ( Or al ) :
Lear ned counsel appear i ng on behal f of t he appel l ant s seeks l eave of t he Cour t t o wi t hdr aw t he appeal , f or , t he par t i es have compr omi sed t he mat t er .
Or der ed accor di ngl y.
( AMI T RAWAL) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
Parkash Chand 2018.06.01 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajwant Kaur and others
Anoop Singh and others
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
