Umed Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 6402 of 2017 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 13. 12. 2017
Umed Si ngh …. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
St at e of Har yana and ot her s . . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU
Pr esent : Mr . Sumi t Gupt a, Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner Mr . Deepak Bal yan, Addl . Advocat e Gener al , Har yana Mr . Deepak Sabher wal , Advocat e f or HUDA
S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE ( Or al ) :
Mr . Sabher wal , t he l ear ned counsel appear i ng on behal f of HUDA, on t he i nst r uct i ons of Mr . Kundan Lal , Assi st ant , makes a st at ement t hat on 19. 05. 2017 t he pet i t i oner was of f er ed possessi on of t he pl ot t hat was al l ot t ed t o hi m, namel y, Pl ot No. 130, Sect or 11, Bahadur gar h, and t hat t he pet i t i oner has t aken possessi on t her eof wi t hout pr ot est . I f t hat i s so, t he pet i t i oner ’ s gr i evance woul d st and r edr essed and t he pet i t i oner woul d not be ent i t l ed t o any al t er nat i ve pl ot as sought i n t he wr i t pet i t i on.
( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE
( HARI NDER SI NGH SI DHU) JUDGE
NOTE: Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO
Parkash Chand 2017.12.13 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parkash Chand 2017.12.13 14:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Umed Singh
State of Haryana
S. J. Vazifdar
Harnender Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court