Court disposed the writ petition by relying on a previous single-page order and directed parties to appear for further proceedings on a specified date. No substantive legal proposition was articulated.
Order dated 12.10.2011 in CWP No.4740 of 2008 followed; parties directed to appear on 23.03.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4442 of 2017 Date of decision:03.03.2017
Pawan Batra
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
The present writ petition is disposed off in terms of order dated 12.10.2011 passed by this Court in CWP No.4740 of 2008 titled as “Nand Lal Ganeriwala vs. State of Haryana and others”.
The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the concerned authority on 23.03.2017 for further proceedings.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE March 03, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nand Lal Ganeriwala vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.4740 of 2008Followed¶11
Pawan Batra
State of Haryana
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
