Roshan Singh v. State of Punjab & Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4417 of 2017 Date of decision:03.03.2017
Roshan Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Rajender Helwa, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
The petitioner is stated to have made a complaint to the Station House Officer regarding the illegal withholding of the tractor-trolly belonging to him but no FIR has been registered. As per Section 154 Cr.P.C, the petitioner has remedy to lodge a complaint against the private respondents to the Superintendent of Police or Station House Officer. If at all, no steps have been taken, still the petitioner has remedy under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Roshan Singh
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Amit Rawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/4417/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court