Amarjit Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Revenue Pb. etc.

Punjab & Haryana HC2 May 2017CWP/22286/2010

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

No.22286 of 2010 { 1 } IN THE HIGH COURT OF…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Amarjit Singh & Ors. Vs Financial Commissioner Revenue Pb. etc. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶42

��-��-�)5�)�0�5��1��,��!��-��)��4��5��-��)�"8&6 ��0��5��2�1��0��)�5��1�)��=��-�)�,�)5��-��1��5�(��0)��,�7� >��1��"#�(�)1��!�=-��-�=��5��5�5��2�0)��-��4��)��2�5� *05,(��5��5� 8$"$"8&#�?��@0)��A&B!�=-�)��=��-�15��-��0�� 1�1��5�(��0)��,�7��>��1��"#�(�)1��!��-��)��4��5��=�)��=��)�� 4��"C7⁾⁵ ��-�)�!��$�$!�1��5��E�)4�!�=-��5��5��0�1��5��-� 4��)��)��4��)�(��, � C7⁾⁵ ��-�)��$ �� &$9$"88�! ��-��)��4��5��A�=��)��03(��5 ��4�)��441�� )��4��1��5 �(��0)��, �7��>��1��"# �(�)1��3��)��-�� 11��)��)�5�!�=-��-�=��4�)��5�2�5��)5�)�5��5�"6$""$"88�$��-� )��4��5��,��"��>��1��7�(�)1��1��5$��-��)��4��5��=��5��2�� -��4��)��)��31��5��-��5�5��0��5!��1�5��0�� $"$"88 �?��@0)��A8B��>��, ��2��-��,)�0�5 ��-��)�� $7$6 �?��0�1�)��F�"$"6B�=��50��)��-��-�)2��E-�)��A"8&&��5 ��3�A"88"! �=-��- �=��5��)��5 �3��-��11��) ��)�5�! ��540)�+�-�3�2�5��)5�)�5��5�&$&$"889�?��@0)��A"�B�3��11��-�

¶62

�� !�� ""�� #��$�� %&��#��'!�(��!��)+,�)-�� .��/�0��12�(�0 �� (��!�� ! �� !��

¶63

� ���� 3�� 4� �� !��

¶67

�,��-��)5�)��=�))��4��!��-��4��)��-�5 ��1�5��2�1 ��0��)�5��1�)��5 ��<0��1 �)�1��4�)(�� *0��>��,�)��)��,��-��)��4��5��)�(�5��4��,��-�( �)�(��-��1��5��5��40��5��-��5A��)�(��441��=��5��(��5�2�5� �)5�)�5��5�8$9$ ��&�?��@0)��A9C"B$��44��1��1�5��,��-��(��-�5 �1��3��5��(��5$��-��)�2��=�4��=��1��5��(��5�3��,�3�1��5 ��3��)��-��1��((��)$��2��(�)��!��-��4��)��-�2� ��0��-��)1��)��0��1�5�3��-��)��,��-��=�)��, )��4��5��=��5��)��5�3��-��0)��+03��05,�!��2�5��*05,(��5 5��)��5��5�"#$#$"86#��5��-��44�11��0)��1��04-�15��-��1��(��-� ��=�)��, �)��4��5��2�5��5��)��5��5 �6$7$"86&! �=-��- �=��0)�-�) ��)(�5�3��-��0)��2�5��*05,(��5��5�"#$'$"89"�5��1�)��,��-��-� 4)��)��4��5��!�=-��=�)��41��-�)��!�-�2��)�,-��3��40�� =��)��4��-��1��5��5��40��41��E�)4�!�=-��5��5 =��-�0��(�1��0�$ ��-��)��4��5��-�5 ��1��2�1 ��0��>��, 5��1�)��> �4�)��)�,�)5��, ��-��(��1��5 ��5 ��0)�-�) ��> 4�)(��*0��,��-��4)��4��)�! �=-��=�)�� -�)��!�)��)��,��-�(��)�(��1��(��,��)�,-��=��)�-�4��)��)�( �1��,!�(�)�,�,��,��)��)��))��,��0)�-�)��-��1��5��5��40��$��-� )��4��5��)1��)��1�5��0��1��(��,�)��0�5�)�+��7��-��)�( E-�)��"86& ��E-�)��"897! �=-��- �=��5��5�5 ��9$7$"897 �3��-� Ramesh Kumar��11��)��)�5�!��2�0)��-��41��5��-��5��)��1 2017.05.11 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶70

��-�2��-��)5��-��1��)��5��0��1��)��-��4�)��!��44)��5��-� 4�4�) �3��> ��5 ��-��2��= ��-��-�)��)��5 �(�)��-� �03(��)$��2��- ��1! ��)! ��-��5 ��-��4��)�� 5!� �� !��-�=��-��-��-�5��1��(�5��-��)�,-��04��! (0�-�1��52�)��4��!��-��5�5��4��-�(��12�� 3��$��-��04��<0�)��-��=��)�-�4��-��3�� -��1��,��5��1�5�4��$��-�)��)�*��5�)��-��=)�� (��1�5��3�-�1��-��4��)��=��-�)�,�)5��1��,��-� 4)�2��0��2��4��1��(��,�)��!�=-��-�=��)��2�)�5$��-��1� �-�=��50��-��4��)��3��4�)4��0�1�5��01��)�$��(��)�� 0�5�)��-��5�)��-��0)��=�015��5��-��,)�0�5��>��, �2��$�

Amarjit Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Revenue Pb. etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Amarjit Singh & Ors. v. Financial Commissioner Revenue Pb. etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Ravinder Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Phuman Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Ashok Kumar Sofat Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Gram Panchayat Sujanpur Rural and Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Umesh Kumar Vs R.S. Kharb

Santosh Garg Vs State of Punjab and Ors.