Oral order where the High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a contempt petition after the respondent's counsel submitted a letter addressing the petitioner's grievance on 27.04.2017, stating no cause of action survived.
Rule discharged; contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.477 of 2017 Date of decision:02.05.2017
Umesh Kumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
R.S.Kharb, IAS, Director
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. S.P.Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajbir Singh, AAG, Haryana.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
In view of the stand taken in the letter dated 27.04.2017 submitted by Mr. Rajbir Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and therefore no cause of action survives in the present petition.
Rule is discharged.
Resultantly, contempt petition stands disposed of.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 02, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2017.05.04 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Umesh Kumar
R.S.Kharb
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
