The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the filed writ petition and dismissed it. The order is supported by the affidavit of the petitioner.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 2017.11.14 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH integrity of this document
CM No.8348 of 2017 in/and CWP No.21074 of 2016
Date of Order: 13.11.2017
Kiran
....Petitioner
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation & Ors
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sehajbir Singh, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.4.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)
Petitioner has filed this application for withdrawal of the writ
petition bearing CWP No.21074 of 2016.
For the reasons stated in the application supported by affidavit
of the petitioner, the same is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
November 13, 2017 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) manoj JUDGE
Kiran
Indian Oil Corporation
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
