In this notice of motion, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the respondent department to decide the petitioner's pending legal notice expeditiously within six weeks and release any due amount.
Direction to decide the legal notice expeditiously within six weeks and release any due amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 16068 of 2017 Date of Decision: July 25, 2017.
M/s Munish Kumar Bansal
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. R.K.Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J (Oral)
Notice of motion.
On the asking of court, Mr.Vikas Mohan Gupta, Addl.A.G., Punjab, who is present in court, accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.
Only grievance of the petitioner is that his bills have not been cleared for the work done by him. According to him, legal notice Annexure P/2 is still pending with the department.
Petition is disposed of with the direction that legal notice be
decided expeditiously in any case not later than six weeks. If any amount is found due to the petitioner, payment of same would be released to him.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
25.7.2017 BB
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's pending bills for work done should be cleared by the department.
Whether a timeline should be fixed for deciding the pending legal notice with the department.
M/s Munish Kumar Bansal
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
