Petitioner filed an application arguing that a speaking order rendered a subsequent writ petition infructuous. The court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 3089 of 2016
Date of decision : 25.07.2017
Preetpal Singh Mothsara
....Petitioner
V/s
Depinder Singh Dhesi
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Arya, Asst. A.G. Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned counsel submits that a speaking order has been passed. He has already posed a challenge to same by filing a writ petition. Thus present petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of aforesaid statement, this petition is dismissed as
having been rendered infructuous.
July 25, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.07.25 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Preetpal Singh Mothsara
Depinder Singh Dhesi
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
