The High Court at Chandigarh dismissed the petitioner's petition as it was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-46378 of 2016
Date of Decision: 21.03.2017
Gurmail Singh @ Gaily ...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. J.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) March 21, 2017 JUDGE jk
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.03.21 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Gurmail Singh @ Gaily
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
