Three petitions were filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The Single Judge allowed the petitions and made interim bail orders absolute without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
Petitions allowed; interim bail orders made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-38319 of 2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
1. CRM-M-38319 of 2016 Date of Decision: 09.02.2017 Nand Kishore ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and anr. ....Respondents 2. CRM-M-38341 of 2016 Avtar Singh ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and anr. ....Respondents 3. CRM-M-38651 of 2016 Surender ....Petitioner VERSUS
State of Haryana and anr. ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate for petitioners in all the petitions.
Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Present petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioners in case criminal complaint No. 21 dated 29.05.2013 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code.
Heard.
Jitender Kumar 2017.02.09 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38319 of 2016
-2-
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have surrendered before the trial Court and have been allowed interim bail under orders dated 25.10.2016, 26.10.2016 and 27.10.2016 passed in their respective petitions.
Petitioners have been summoned for offences punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 120-B and 420 IPC by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kosli on the complaint filed by respondent no. 2. It has been submitted that earlier complaint was made to the police but petitioners were found to be innocent.
Keeping in view above facts but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, these petitions are allowed and orders dated 25.10.2016, 26.10.2016 and 27.10.2016 passed in respective petitions are made absolute.
February 09 , 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.02.09 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners under Section 438 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nand Kishore
Avtar Singh
Surender
State of Haryana
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
