Sanjay Jain v. Vivek Sachdeva
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-35799 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 09, 2017
Sanjay Jain
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
Vivek Sachdeva
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Pulkit Dagar, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner (s). for complainant/respondent No.2.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the present petition as the same has become infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn as rendered infructuous.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) February 09, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Sachin Mehta 2017.02.16 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Jain
Vivek Sachdeva
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court