Oral order devoid of substantive reasoning, disposing of the matter via cross-reference to a judgment of the same date without explanatory text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-32469 of 2016
Date of Decision: 20.07.2017
Harjit Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For orders, see judgment of even date passed in CRM-M-28797
of 2016 (Baljinder Singh vs. State of Punjab).
July 20, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.07.24 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Harjit Singh
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
