Petitioner withdrew appeals against an order declining access to sale deed copies during witness examination. Court dismissed the petition but granted liberty to challenge the legal admissibility of the witness testimony separately.
petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge admissibility of PW9 testimony separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRR No.7-2011
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Revision No.7 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 18, 2017.
Inder Sain
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
Central Bureau of Investigation
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate Retainer counsel for respondent-CBI with Mr. S.S. Yadav, DAL, CBI.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
This is revision against the order dated 23.12.2010 passed by Special Judge (CBI), Haryana at Panchkula whereby request of counsel for the petitioner during examination of PW9 Joginder Singh for production of copies of the sale deed, was declined.
Sachin Mehta 2017.07.20 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
CRR No.7-2011
-2-
July 18, 2017 Sachin M.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Sachin Mehta 2017.07.20 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
Inder Sain
Central Bureau of Investigation
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
