Bagicha Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30253 of 2016
Date of Decision: 22.03.2017
Bagicha Singh
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. G.S. Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Neelam Kashyap, DAG, Haryana.
None for respondent no. 5.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel submit that FIR has already been registered against respondent no. 5.
In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel, the instant petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) March 22, 2017 JUDGE jk
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jitender Kumar 2017.03.23 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Bagicha Singh
State of Haryana
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court