The High Court disposed of two connected petitions as infructuous because the matter had been finally decided by the trial court on 01.04.2017, rendering the challenges to the domestic violence orders no longer存续.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-29693 of 2014 [ 1 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-29693 of 2014 Date of Decision : December 11, 2017
Mrs. Chetna .............................................................Petitioner Versus Rajesh .................................................................... Respondent CRR No. 2327 of 2014 Rajesh ................................................................... Petitioner
Versus
Mrs. Chetna ....................................................... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present: Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-29693-2014 and for the respondent in CRR-2327-2014
Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR-2327-2014 and for the respondent in CRM-M-29693-2014
LISA GILL, J. (Oral)
Challenge in both these petitions is to order dated 27.05.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal on an appeal filed by Rajesh against the order dated 10.09.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kaithal in a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 filed by Chetna wife of Rajesh whereby an application for interim maintenance as well as restoration of custody of the minor child to Ms. Chetna was decided. Rupinder Kaur 2017.12.22 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Crl. Misc. No. M-29693 of 2014 [ 2 ]
Learned counsel for the parties inform that the matter has been finally decided by the learned trial Court on 01.04.2017, therefore, both the present petitions have been rendered infructuous.
Both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.
( LISA GILL ) 11.12.2017 JUDGE rupi
Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable: Yes / No
Rupinder Kaur 2017.12.22 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mrs. Chetna
Rajesh
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
