Disposed

Birbal Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Dec 2017CRM-M/19592/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought transfer of CBI investigation and protection of life and liberty regarding a criminal FIR. High Court found investigation concluded via final report and no immediate threat, thus disposed of petition with liberty to approach State police for future protection if needed.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to approach Senior Superintendent of Police for protection of life and liberty if apprehension arises in future.

Birbal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM No.M-19592 of 2016

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Criminal Misc. No.M- 19592 of 2016(O&M) Date of Decision: December 11 , 2017.

¶5

Birbal Singh

¶6

...... PETITIONER (s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s)

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

¶10

Present: Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.

¶12

¶13

LISA GILL, J.

¶14

This petition has been filed seeking transfer of investigation in FIR No.119 dated 29.09.2015 under Sections 376/366A/363/506 IPC, Sections 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station City Bajakhana to some other independent agency. It is further prayed that life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members be protected.

¶15

It is not in dispute that final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has since been presented. It was stated by learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court on 19.05.2017 that as the final report has been presented, prayer in respect to transfer of the investigation is rendered infructuous. The petitioner sought to press his prayer regarding protection of his life and liberty.

¶16

Omkar Singh 2017.12.14 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶17

CRM No.M-19592 of 2016

¶18

-2-

¶19

It is submitted that at present point of time, trial in the abovesaid FIR is proceeding and there is no imminent and immediate threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner informs of any instance raising apprehension to his life and liberty or his family members, necessary action shall immediately be taken.

¶21

Therefore, in view of the position as above, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.

¶22

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.2 in case there is any instance giving rise to an apprehension to his life and liberty or any of his family members arising out of the present controversy. In case such application is filed by the petitioner, respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Faridkot is directed to look into the same and necessary action, if any/as may be required be taken in accordance with law.

¶23

It is made clear that no expression of opinion on the merits of the

¶24

case has been expressed.

¶25

( LISA GILL ) December 11 , 2017. JUDGE ‘om’

¶26

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶27

Omkar Singh 2017.12.14 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Birbal Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birbal Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mishra Singh Vs State of Punjab

Shiva Vs State of Punjab

Sher Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jagjeet Singh @ Jeeta Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Chetna Vs Rajesh

Kashmir Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.