Disposed

Rajni v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Feb 2017CRM-M/2800/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought completion of studies and marriage and direction to police to act on her representation. Court disposed of the matter by directing respondent police to examine the representation but clarified the order does not provide protection from future legal proceedings. No substantive proposition established.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Superintendent of Police, Mewat to look into representation made by petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

Rajni Vs State of Haryana… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-2800-2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl. Misc. No.M-2800 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 21, 2017

¶5

Rajni

¶6

..........PETITIONER(s).

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

State of Haryana and others

¶9

........RESPONDENT(s).

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr. Mohd. Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

¶12

¶13

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

CRM-5132-2017

¶15

This is application for placing on record representation (Annexure P-3), which is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CRM-M-2800-2017

¶16

Heard.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is presently residing at village Khori Khurd, Police Station Tauru, District Mewat (Haryana). She is working as telecaller in the Maruti Card Agency namely Fortune Car, Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) and is also pursuing her further studies. She wants to complete her studies as well as to marry with a boy of her own choice to which her family members are not agreeing.

¶18

Without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is

¶19

Sachin Mehta 2017.02.22 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

¶20

CRM-M-2800-2017

¶21

-2-

¶22

disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Mewat to look into the representation Annexure P-3 made by petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law on receipt of copy of this order and representation in his office.

¶23

However, it is made clear that the above order will not be interpreted to provide protection to the petitioner from any legal action to be taken in any civil, criminal or any other proceedings initiated against him in accordance with law.

¶24

( SURINDER GUPTA ) February 21, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶25

Sachin Mehta 2017.02.22 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

Rajni v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajni v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jasbir Singh Vs State of Punjab

Arun Kumar Bagga Vs State of Punjab

Jarnail Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Mohd. Riaz Vs State of Punjab

Darbara Singh @ Billa Vs State of Punjab