Application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. seeking special leave to appeal against acquittal was dismissed as devoid of merit. Court found contradictions in witness testimony and no perversity in trial court’s decision.
No relief granted; leave to file appeal declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-A-200-MA-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A-200-MA-2016
Date of decision: 15.11.2017
Daya Ram
..... Applicant
Versus
Narain Singh and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
CRM-A-200-MA-2016 -2-
rescue, the accused caught hold of him from back side and gave beatings to him too. In the incident, the respondents-accused have also received injuries from the public gathering.
Rishu Kataria 2017.11.20 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-A-200-MA-2016
-3-
November 15, 2017
rishu
( RAMENDRA JAIN ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.11.20 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the special leave to file an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents should be granted.
Whether the impugned judgment of the trial Court acquitting the respondents is illegal or perverse.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Daya Ram
Narain Singh and others
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
