The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the petition when the petitioner's counsel requested it due to the Bench's disagreement with the submissions.
Permission to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12919-2017
Date of decision: 14.11.2017
Reeta Rani
..... Petitioner
Versus
Satish Kumar
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
Ordered accordingly.
November 14, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.11.14 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Reeta Rani
Satish Kumar
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
