Allowed

Sukhwinder Singh @ Babbi v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Nov 2017CRM-M/17197/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted a quashing order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. Relying on the trial court's report that the compromise dated 08.05.2017 was voluntary, the Court quashed the FIR to restore harmony between the parties.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0198 dated 21.11.2016 registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC is hereby quashed.

Sukhwinder Singh @ Babbi Vs State of Punjab… — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CRM-M-17197 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-17197 of 2017 Date of Decision: 21.11.2017

¶5

Sukhwinder Singh @ Babbi

¶6

....Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶11

Present: - Mr. R.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for Mr. A.S. Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

¶12

Mr. Amit Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6.

¶13

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Prayer in the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been made for quashing FIR No.0198 dated 21.11.2016 registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, on the basis of compromise dated 08.05.2017 (Annexure P-2).

¶15

Pursuant to the order dated 07.10.2017 of this Court, the parties appeared before the trial Court on 30.10.2017 to get their statements recorded. Learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, has submitted her report vide letter bearing No.303 dated 02.11.2017 duly forwarded by learned District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana vide letter No.5994/E.B dated 07.11.2017.

¶16

According to the report, the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib is satisfied that compromise entered into between the parties is voluntary and is not the result of any pressure or coercion in any Ravinder Singh 2017.11.21 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this documentmanner.

¶17

-2-

¶18

CRM-M-17197 of 2017

¶19

Considering the report of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib dated 02.11.2017 and the fact that the compromise will bring harmony in relations between the parties, FIR No.0198 dated 21.11.2016 registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, is hereby quashed.

¶20

Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

¶22

November 21, 2017 R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶23

Ravinder Singh 2017.11.21 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Sukhwinder Singh @ Babbi v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhwinder Singh @ Babbi v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurjant Singh Vs State of Punjab

Veerpal Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Amandeep Singh @ Noni Vs State of Punjab

Doongar Ram Vs State of Punjab

Manjit Singh Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Inderpal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another