The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The petitioner had joined investigation, so the court made the earlier interim order absolute.
Order dated 06.09.2017 passed by this Court granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-32865 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.11.2017
Veerpal Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner Veerpal Kaur in case FIR No.48 dated 10.07.2017 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 506, 34, 325 and 326 IPC at Police Station Sehna.
On instructions from ASI Avtar Singh, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 06.09.2017 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) November 20, 2017 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Ravinder Singh 2017.11.20 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner on 06.09.2017 should be made absolute given her joining of investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Veerpal Kaur
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
