Petitioner prayed to withdraw the petition after the Bench did not agree with his submissions. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order is discretionary and resolves only the specific proceeding, without establishing any general legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-15907 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2017
Manoj Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: - Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chopra, DAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not agreeing with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 27, 2017 R.S.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
Yes/No
Yes/No
Ravinder Singh 2017.10.27 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Manoj Kumar
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
