Allowed

Narender Kumar v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC4 May 2017CRM-M/1419/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner's regular bail petition in an FIR under Sections 306, 498-A, and 34 IPC, holding that no useful purpose would be served by further detention as the trial will take a long time.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail upon furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Judge/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon.

Narender Kumar Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2017)

¶1

CRM-M-1419-2017

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-1419-2017 Date of Decision:- 04.05.2017

Narender Kumar

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. S.K. Daaria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana.

¶13

¶14

RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)

¶15

Present petition is for release of petitioner on regular bail in FIR No.579 dated 01.07.2016, under Sections 306, 498-A and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Gurgaon.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage of Abhilasha (since deceased) was solemnized with petitioner on 27.04.2008 and she has committed suicide on 01.07.2016 i.e. after 7 years of the marriage. Moreover, initially the FIR was registered under Section 304-B IPC and during investigation the challan has been presented under Sections 306, 498-A and 34 IPC.

¶17

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Balraj Singh, has informed that after framing of charge, 15 witnesses have to be examined and the trial is fixed for 06.05.2017.

¶18

Naresh Kumar 2017.05.05 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CRM-M-1419-2017

¶20

-2-

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record.

¶22

The petitioner was arrested on 20.07.2016. Since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. The final conclusion of trial will take a long time.

¶23

In view of above facts, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on her furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon.

¶24

Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect, on merits in the trial of the main case, in any manner.

¶25

May 04, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶26

Naresh Kumar 2017.05.05 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Narender Kumar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narender Kumar v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Amarjit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jasleen Kaur Vs Kirandeep Singh

Taranjit Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Neeraj Alias Neeru Vs State of Punjab

Tarsem Lal and Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Anr.