Section 482 CrPC petition for quashing Sections 406, 498-A IPC FIR dismissed as withdrawn. Court exempted personal presence of specific petitioners for trial.
petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to plead before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11024-2017 Date of Decision:- 04.05.2017
Tarsem Lal and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.230 dated 24.08.2015, under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Pinjore, District Panchkula.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to take/urge all the pleas contained in it before the learned trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore-said liberty, as prayed for.
However, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are old parents-in-law whereas petitioner Nos.3 to 6 are distant relatives of complainant, the personal presence of the petitioners is exempted before the trial Court.
May 04, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Naresh Kumar 2017.05.08 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Tarsem Lal and others
State of Haryana
another
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
