Single judge allowed an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., making an earlier order absolute and disposing of the matter.
Order dated 05.09.2017 passed by the Court was made absolute; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-31674-2017
Date of decision: 13.11.2017
Krishan
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Yashveer Kharb, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
In the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 833 dated 20.07.2017 registered under Sections 181, 200, 418, 420, 468 and 471 IPC at Police Station City, Panipat.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Kirshan Gopal, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and nothing is to be recovered from her.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 05.09.2017 passed by this Court is made absolute.
The petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
November 13, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2017.11.13 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the registered FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishan
State of Haryana
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
