In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioner, accused in a theft case, argued against custody. The court rejected the petition as it found the petitioner required for custodial interrogation.
Petition under Section 438 CrPC dismissed as petitioner requires custodial interrogation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
105
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-11818 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 07, 2017
Parveen
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.82 dated 17.02.2017 under Sections 380 and 457 IPC, registered at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.
From the record, I find that in the present case FIR has been got registered by complainant Surinder Singh, who stated that one Harrow (Agricultural Equipment), which was in his filed, was stolen. The present petitioner has been named by the co-accused who stated that he (coaccused) and present petitioner have committed the offence.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 17:54 I attest to the accuracy andcase, I find that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation. authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRM No.M-11818 of 2017
-2-
Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is
dismissed.
| April 07, | 2017 | (INDERJIT SINGH) |
|---|---|---|
| Vgulati | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes | |
| Whether reportable | No |
Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case related to theft under Sections 380 and 457 IPC.
Whether the petitioner requires custodial interrogation.
Parveen
State of Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
