Narender Singh approached the Court via CRM No.M-10477 of 2017. The present petition was decided based on the detailed order passed in Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana (CRM No.M-8602 of 2017) of the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-10477 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 07, 2017
Narender Singh
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Mr.Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the complainant.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
For detailed order, see order passed in CRM No.M-8602 of
2017 titled as Zile Singh vs. State of Haryana of even date.
April 07, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Zile Singh vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶14
CRM No.M-8602 of 2017
Narender Singh
State of Haryana
INDERJIT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
