Petitioners withdrew COCP No.83 of 2017 with liberty to avail appropriate remedy; Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.83 of 2017 Date of decision: 20.02.2017
Raj Kumar and others
..Petitioners
Versus
Sh. Parveen Kumar Thind
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this
petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
| 20.02.2017 | (DAYA CHAUDHARY) | |
|---|---|---|
| neetu | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable |
√ Yes/No √ Yes/No |
Neetu Rani 2017.02.21 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
SH. PARVEEN KUMAR THIND
DAYA CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
