Respondents appeared stating the order was complied with and a subsequent writ petition became infructuous, with an apology for delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1332 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.02.2017
Naresh and others
..Petitioners
Versus
Shri Atul Kumar and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. D.K. Mittal, DAG, Haryana.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 5 submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. The petitioner has also filed CWP No.12691 of 2016 for the same relief, which has been rendered infructuous vide order dated 04.07.2016.
Although the order has been complied with and there is delay, for which, the respondents have tendered unconditional apology. Moreover, the writ petition filed by the petitioner for the same relief, has also been rendered infructuous.
Nothing remains in the present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly.
| 20.02.2017 | (DAYA CHAUDHARY) | |
|---|---|---|
| neetu | Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable |
JUDGE √ Yes/No √ Yes/No |
Neetu Rani 2017.02.23 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Naresh and others
Shri Atul Kumar and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
