Petitioner's counsel submitted that the previous order in their favor has been orally communicated as implemented. Court held that nothing remains pending and disposed of the contempt petition accordingly.
Contempt petition dismissed as no case remained upon submission of oral implementation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1933 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.07.2017
Kulwant Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
Shri Sanjay Mitra and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Ms. Jasneet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that orally she has been intimated that the order passed in favour of the petitioner has been implemented.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed of accordingly.
24.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2017.07.25 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Kulwant Singh
Shri Sanjay Mitra and another
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
