This court dismissed a contempt petition filed regarding an order dated 19.10.1995 in CWP No.184 of 1995, holding that no negligence was established.
Contempt petition dismissed; liberty granted to challenge the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1907 of 2017 Date of decision: 21.07.2017
Satnam Kaur
..Petitioner
Versus
Jaspal Singh and others ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
The petitioner earlier filed COCP No.982 of 2015, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 28.04.2015 to first make a demand notice upon the respondents.
In pursuance of said order, the petitioner sent legal notice dated 06.06.2015 and order dated 27.02.2017 has been passed, whereby, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected not only on the ground of delay but on other grounds also.
Now the present contempt petition has been filed against order
dated 19.10.1995 passed by this Court in CWP No.184 of 1995.
No contempt is made out.
Dismissed.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order.
21.07.2017 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2017.07.24 11:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Satnam Kaur
Jaspal Singh and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
