Kanwal Singh through His Lrs v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RFA No.7448 of 2015 Date of Decision : 21.3.2016
Kanwal Singh through his LRs
......Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgement dated 6.11.2015 passed by this court in RFA No.3787 of 2009 (Gaje Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and another). They jointly pray for disposal of the instant appeal in terms of the order dated 6.11.2015 passed by this court in RFA No.3787 of 2009.
In view of the above common stand taken by learned counsel for the parties, this appeal is ordered to be disposed of in terms of the order dated 6.11.2015 passed by this court in RFA No.3787 of 2009 (Gaje Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and another).
Disposed of, accordingly.
21.3.2016 GS
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
GREESH SAHNI 2016.03.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
GREESH SAHNI 2016.03.22 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gaje Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and anotherFollowed¶13
RFA No.3787 of 2009 (Gaje Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and another)
Kanwal Singh and LRs
State of Haryana and others
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court