Oral order disposing of an appeal referred to a previous judgment of the same court. Neither party contested the common submission leading to the decision.
Appeal disposed of in terms of order dated 28.1.2016 in RFA No. 1838 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 673 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.3.2016
Phoolwati alias Phoolpati and others
.. Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that present appeal is squarely covered by the order dated 28.1.2016 passed by this Court in RFA No. 1838 of 2011 (State of Haryana and others Vs. Ramphal). They jointly pray for disposal of the present appeal in terms of the order dated 28.1.2016 passed by this Court in Ramphal's case (supra).
In view of the above common stand taken by learned counsel for the parties, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order dated 28.1.2016 passed by this Court in Ramphal's case (supra).
Disposed of, accordingly.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ) JUDGE
21.3.2016 AK Sharma
AMIT KUMAR 2016.03.22 13:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana and others Vs. RamphalFollowed¶13
RFA No. 1838 of 2011 (State of Haryana and others Vs. Ramphal)
Phoolwati alias Phoolpati
State of Haryana
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
