The court disposed of the writ petition seeking a one-time settlement as withdrawn by the petitioner, allowing liberty to file a fresh petition upon payment of the demanded amount.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file fresh petition upon payment of demand.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP-6283-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6283-2016
Date of decision: 10.11.2016
Dinesh Kumar Gupta
..... Petitioner
Versus
Haryana Financial Corporation and another
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
“Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to pay the entire amount which would be possible in case of one time settlement which according to him would be approximately ` 12 to 13
Rishu Kataria 2016.11.15 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-6283-2016 -2-
lakhs. He seeks time to produce the demand draft for the
aforesaid amount.
Adjourned to 4.8.2016 as prayed.”
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
November 10, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2016.11.15 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Dinesh Kumar Gupta
Haryana Financial Corporation
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
