Petitioners sought quashing of a CAT order regarding promotion under specific rules. Petitioners withdrew the writ petition with no objection. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-17810-2016
Date of decision: 10.11.2016
Chandigarh Administration and others
..... Petitioners
Versus
Rajnish Bala and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. AP Setia, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. GS Sathi, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
November 10, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2016.11.11 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Chandigarh Administration and others
Rajnish Bala and others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
