The High Court dispensed with the merits and directed Respondent No.2 to dispose of the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-9) expeditively, preferably within two months.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to dispose of representation Annexure P-9 expeditively within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2016.03.18 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CWP No.4970 of 2016 Date of Decision: 16.03.2016.
Dhanpreet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SABINA, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the selection list Annexure P-6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has submitted representation Annexure P-9 to respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievance but no action has been taken on the same so far. At this stage, petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the representation Annexure P-9 within a fixed time frame.
Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation Annexure P-9 moved by the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.
March 16, 2016 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhanpreet Singh
Union of India
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
