The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the second call for hearing.
The petitioner was permitted no cause to appear and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2016.03.16 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CWP No.14980 of 1995 Date of Decision:16.03.2016
Avtar Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Presiding Officer and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None.
SABINA, J.
Even on the second call none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
March 16, 2016 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Avtar Singh
Presiding Officer
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
