Dismissed
M/S United Steel Industries v. Union of India and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/4968/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4968 of 2016 Decided on : 16.11.2016
M/s United Steel Industries
. . . Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and another
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Anshul Mangla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has approached this Court, seeking direction to the respondents, who have, despite declaring the petitioner to be the highest bidder on the opening date, neither communicated their rejection nor acceptance to the petitioner, even otherwise, during the currency of the offer made by the petitioner, sold a substantial quantity of the material (subjectmatter of tender) through auction.
| (AJAY |
KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| (RA | MENDRA JAIN) | |
| November 16, 2016 | JUDGE | |
| J.Ram | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: |
Yes/No Yes/No |
Jawala Ram 2016.11.21 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
M/s United Steel Industries
Union of India
Another
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court