The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a plot allotment as withdrawn by the petitioner, who requested liberty to approach the civil court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach civil court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108 Civil Writ Petition No.23554 of 2016 Date of decision: November 16, 2016
Vedpal Yadav
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
suit.
Sonia Kinra 2016.11.21 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No.23554 of 2016
-2-
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
November 16, 2016
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
sonia gugnani
Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
Sonia Kinra 2016.11.21 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Parminder Singh and another vs. Haryana Urban Development authority and anotherReferred¶1
Civil Writ Petition No.16222 of 2014
Vedpal Yadav
State of Haryana
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
