Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for the grant of disability pension benefits. The court disposed of the petition by directing respondent No. 2 to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's representation within two months.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to dispose of the representation moved by the petitioner (Annexure P-10) within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 4358 of 2016 Date of Decision: 4.3.2016.
Surinder Singh
........Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Rajeev Ananad, Advocate for the petitioner.
SABINA, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for direction to the respondents to grant and release him disability pension benefits
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has submitted a number of representations to the respondents for redressal of his grievance but no action has been taken on the same so far.
Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to dispose of the representation Annexure P-10, moved by the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within two months from the receipt of certified copy of this order.
(SABINA) JUDGE
March 04, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.03.11 14:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surinder Singh
Union of India
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
