Disposed

Ram Niwas v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Nov 2016CWP/24450/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought re-fixation of his pay scale due to missing service book sent to the respondent. The Single Judge directed the respondent to act on the petitioner's representation within four weeks and prepare service book if traceable.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to take action on representation within four weeks; alternatively, prepare service book based on official documents.

Ram Niwas Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP No.24450 of 2016 Date of decision: 28.11.2016

Ram Niwas

..Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶8

Present: Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

¶10

Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)

¶11

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that his service book was sent to the office of respondent No.2 and in absence of the same, the pay scale of the petitioner has not been re-fixed.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also made representation dated 17.08.2016 (Annexure P-2) but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case, directions are issued by this Court to consider representation dated 17.08.2016 (Annexure P-2) within some stipulated period.

¶13

Keeping in view the limited prayer of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take action on the representation dated 17.08.2016 (Annexure P-2) within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶14

In case, the service book of the petitioner is not traceable, the

¶15

Neetu Rani 2016.12.01 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

same be prepared on the basis of official documents and necessary action be taken thereafter.

¶17

Disposed of accordingly.

¶18

28.11.2016		(DAYA CHAUDHARY)
neetu		JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable	√ Yes/No √ Yes/No

¶19

Neetu Rani 2016.12.01 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Ram Niwas v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Niwas v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harbhajan Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Hardeep Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Jasdeep Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Baldev Singh and Others Vs P S P C L and Others

Prithvi Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Davinder Sharma Vs the Pspcl & Ors.