Disposed

Baldev Singh and Others v. P S P C L and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Nov 2016CWP/24386/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a writ mandamus for promotional increment benefits governed by specific circulars, with counsel citing a prior decision by the same Court. The Court disposed of the petition on a limited prayer without issuing notice, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' case in light of the cited prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioners' case in light of prior decision and pass necessary orders within three months; relief in notice to be granted within two months if petitioners found entit

Baldev Singh and Others Vs P S P C… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP No.24386 of 2016 Date of decision: 28.11.2016

¶3

Baldev Singh and others

¶4

..Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others

¶7

..Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶9

Present: Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)

¶12

The prayer in the present petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant 23 years' promotional increment benefit in view of Circular no.17/90 dated 23.04.1990 and Circular no.392 dated 28.07.2000.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by decision of this Court rendered in CWP No.16737 of 2011 titled as Om Parkash Dua vs Punjab State Electricity Board and others decided on 14.12.2015 . She further submits that the petitioners served a legal notice dated 16.08.2016 (Annexure P-5) upon the respondents but the same has not been considered in spite of the fact that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by Om Parkash Dua's case (supra). She further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, the directions are issued by this Court to consider the legal notice dated 16.08.2016 served upon the respondents.

¶14

Neetu Rani 2016.12.01 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶15

CWP No.24386 of 2016

¶16

¶17

Keeping in view the limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners and without issuing notice to the other party, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in view of Om Parkash Dua's case (supra) and pass necessary order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶18

In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for the relief sought for in the legal notice and their case is covered by Om Parkash Dua's case (supra), the same be granted within a period of two months thereafter and in case, the petitioners are still aggrieved in any manner, they are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.

¶19

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

28.11.2016		(DAYA CHAUDHARY)
neetu		JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable	√ Yes/No √ Yes/No

¶21

Neetu Rani 2016.12.01 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Baldev Singh and Others v. P S P C L and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baldev Singh and Others v. P S P C L and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harbhajan Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Hardeep Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Jasdeep Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Prithvi Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Davinder Sharma Vs the Pspcl & Ors.

Ram Niwas Vs State of Haryana & Ors.