This court disposed of a constitutional petition by relegating the petitioner to the alternative civil remedy, noting that factual questions required cogent evidence, without expressing an opinion on the merits.
Relegation of the petitioner to the alternative civil remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-23376-2016
Date of decision: 11.11.2016
M/s Lakshit Construction Pvt. Ltd.
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the averments made in the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we dispose of this petition by relegating the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy as may be available to it, in accordance with law.
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
November 11, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2016.11.15 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of responding authorities should be disposed of by relegating the petitioner to alternative civil remedy due to factual disputes.
M/s Lakshit Construction Pvt. Ltd.
State of Haryana
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
