Partly allowed

M/S Klj Developers Private Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Oct 2016CWP/21013/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners alleged that their land was used by HUDA to carve out plots for Sector-77 Faridabad allottees without acquisition or compensation. The Court directed HUDA to conduct a demarcation with notice to resolve factual disputes and avoid expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Administrator, HUDA, Faridabad to carry out demarcation of the land after giving notice to the petitioner and others to determine the petitioner's claim regarding the carved-out plots

M/S Klj Developers Private Ltd. Vs… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.21013 of 2016. Date of Decision: October 06, 2016

¶3

M/s KLJ Developers Private Limited ......Petitioner

¶4

versus

¶5

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

¶6

**CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA. *****

¶7

Present: Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶8

-.-

¶9

Surya Kant, J . (Oral)

¶10

The petitioner-Company alleges that a part of its land has been utilized by the respondent-HUDA authorities for carving out plots allotted to the successful allottees in a draw of lots for Sector-77, Faridabad. Some of the allottees have been impleaded as party-respondents and it is averred that plot Nos.78 to 81-P allotted to them are actually carved out on the petitioner's land.

¶11

It is further alleged that the petitioner's land has neither been acquired nor compensation paid.

¶12

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the writ petition involves factual issues which can be effectively resolved after carrying out demarcation at the site in the presence of the parties, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Faridabad to carry out demarcation after notice to the petitioner and other affected persons and determine the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner in accordance with

¶13

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.10.19 17:01 I attest to the accuracy andlaw. It is, however, made clear that no allotment in favour of respondent integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶14

[2]

¶15

CWP No.21013 of 2016

¶16

Nos.7 to 13 shall be cancelled and it shall be the responsibility of HUDA authorities to ensure that each allottee being successful in draw of lots, gets the plot.

¶17

Since we have not called upon the respondents at this stage, this order shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the claim.

¶18

Let the needful be done within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶19

Ordered accordingly.

¶20

	[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
October 06, 2016 mohinder	[SUDIP AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether Reportable	: Yes/No

¶21

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.10.19 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

M/S Klj Developers Private Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Klj Developers Private Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhjit Singh @ Sukha Vs State of Punjab

Akash Vs D.R.O Cum Land Acquisition Collector and Anr.

Mukandi and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Bhim Singh and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Amar Singh and Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ram Singh Vs State of Haryana & Others