Dismissed

Ram Singh v. State of Haryana & Others

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Oct 2016CWP/21001/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court noticed that the petitioner's compensation award remained undisbursed. Directing the respondents to deposit the awarded amount with the Executing Court within two months to enable disbursement to the petitioner, noting that enhancement pending in other cases does not apply here.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to deposit the awarded compensation amount with the Executing Court within two months.

Ram Singh Vs State of Haryana & Others — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.21001 of 2016. Date of Decision: October 06, 2016

¶3

Ram Singh ......Petitioner

¶4

versus

¶5

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

¶6

**CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA. *****

¶7

Present: Mr.Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶8

-.-

¶9

Surya Kant, J . (Oral)

¶10

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only at this stage.

¶11

On our asking, Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf.

¶12

Let three copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶13

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 or to serve respondent No.4 at this stage as no order prejudicial to their interest is being passed.

¶14

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is that full amount of compensation alongwith interest and other statutory benefits has not been disbursed by the respondents as per the Award dated 12.01.2015 passed by the Reference Court.

¶15

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.10.19 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

CWP No.21001 of 2016

¶17

[2]

¶18

It appears that in the cases of some other land-owners, the compensation amount has been further enhanced by this Court vide order dated 27.05.2016 in RFA No.5316 of 2014 (Pushpender Kumar and others versus State of Haryana and others) and other connected appeals though the Regular First Appeal preferred by the petitioner is still pending.

¶19

Be that as it may, the petitioner is entitled to be paid compensation as has been awarded by the Reference Court. Since it is not known whether or not he has filed Execution Petition, we direct the respondents that due amount of compensation be deposited with the Executing Court within two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, so as to enable that Court to disburse the same to the petitioner and/or other claimants.

¶20

Ordered accordingly.

¶21

	[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
October 06, 2016 mohinder	[SUDIP AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned	: Yes/No
Whether Reportable	: Yes/No

¶22

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.10.19 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Ram Singh v. State of Haryana & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Singh v. State of Haryana & Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhjit Singh @ Sukha Vs State of Punjab

Akash Vs D.R.O Cum Land Acquisition Collector and Anr.

Mukandi and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Bhim Singh and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Amar Singh and Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Klj Developers Private Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.