Petitioners withdrawing a writ petition challenging rejection of claims under Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme 2006. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19247 of 2016 Date of decision: 17.10.2016
Radhey Shyam and others ..... Petitioners
Versus
Chandigarh Administration and others ..... Respondents
Present: Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 17.05.2016 (Annexure P-4) whereby claim of the petitioners under the Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme – 2006 (for short 'the Scheme') has been rejected.
the remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law.
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
October 17, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) R.S. JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Ravinder Singh 2016.10.18 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Radhey Shyam and others
Chandigarh Administration and others
Ayay Kumar Mittal
Ramendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
